Legal Opinion

Parker v. Matthews

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 11, 2012No. 11-845PublishedCited by 1,160 opinions

1Per curiam

In this habeas case, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit set aside two 29-year-old murder convictions based on the flimsiest of rationales. The court’s decision is a textbook example of what the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA) proscribes: “using federal habeas corpus review as a vehicle to second-guess the reasonable decisions of state courts.” Renico v. Lett, 559 U. S. 766, 779 (2010). We therefore grant the petition for certiorari and reverse.

HH

Between 1 and 2 a.m. on the morning of June 29, 1981, respondent David Eugene Matthews broke into…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Cullen v. PinholsterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Darden v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Donnelly v. DeChristoforoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,160 opinions

  1. White v. WoodallSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  2. Marshall v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Robert Murray v. Dora SchriroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  4. Shinn v. KayerSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
  5. Jackson v. ConwayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014

1,155 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API