Legal Opinion

Smith v. Penn Mut. Life Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 20, 1943No. 4 Div. 279PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Justice.

Action of assumpsit by appellant against appellee for a sum of money alleged to be due on a policy of life insurance issued to the plaintiff's intestate by the defendant on March 25th, 1901,, insuring the life on which all his premiums had been paid, — in short a paid-up policy.

The pleas were the general issue, pleaded in short by consent, with leave to give in evidence matters of special defense as if properly pleaded.

The special defense relied on, which finds support in the evidence, is that the policy automatically lapsed, without notice, under the terms of a certificate of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Alaska Packers Assn. v. Industrial Accident Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Hoopeston Canning Co. v. CullenSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Griffin v. McCoachSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Barrow Steamship Co. v. KaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  5. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. GrosjeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1937

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. James W. Partain v. The First National Bank of MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972
  2. Bockman v. WCH, LLCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  3. Gustin v. Sun Life Assur. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945
  4. Gem State Mutual Life Insurance Ass'n v. O'CONNELLIdaho Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Gem State Mutual Life Insurance Ass'n v. O'CONNELLIdaho Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API