Serradell v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RABINOWITZ, Chief Justice.
This appeal stems from a death benefit claim made by appellant Philip Serradell under a group accident insurance policy. The superior court granted summary judgment for Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company and entered judgment dismissing Serradell’s claim. The superior court ex plained its judgment in the following manner:
Serradell’s right to recover under the group life insurance policy is governed by the policy itself and the surrounding circumstances. The enrollment form, brochure and policy taken together do not yield a reasonable expectation that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Stordahl v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1977
- O'Neill Investigations, Inc. v. Illinois Employers Insurance of WausauAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Calista Corp. v. MannAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
- Edwards v. FrankeAlaska Supreme Court · 1961
- Burgess Construction Co. v. LindleyAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. BongenAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
- Harrelson v. HarrelsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company, a Minnesota Corporation v. F.H. K.W.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Cole v. State Farm Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2006
- Thomas v. Anchorage Equal Rights CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.