Cole v. State Farm Insurance Co.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRYNER, Chief Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Homer Cole and Annette Mayac divorced each other, reunited, and lived together without remarrying. - After being hit and injured by a car, Cole sought medical and underin-sured motorist payments under Mayac's State Farm automobile insurance policy, which named Mayac as the person insured and also extended coverage to the named insured's "spouse." At issue in this appeal is whether Cole was entitled to coverage as Mayac's spouse despite not being legally married. Because the policy unambiguously defined spouse to mean a legally married husband or…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- West v. Umialik Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2000
- University of Alaska v. TumeoAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
- Johnson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- Burgess Construction Co. v. LindleyAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Huit v. Ashwater Burns, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2016
- Neese v. Lithia Chrysler Jeep of Anchorage, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Jennifer L. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
- D&D Servs. v. CavittAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
- Weimer v. CONTINENTAL CAR & TRUCK, LLCAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.