Legal Opinion

Calista Corp. v. Mann

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1977No. 2800PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ERWIN, Justice.

This case presents an issue of first impression in Alaska, the recognition of the *55doctrine of equitable or virtual adoption. This issue will be addressed after a statement of the facts.

Appellant Calista Corporation is a Native Regional corporation established pursuant to the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act1 and organized under the laws of the State of Alaska.

Appellee Katie Mann is a Yup’ik Eskimo woman who resides in Hooper Bay, Alaska. Appellee Catherine Peters is an Athabascan woman who resides in Bethel, Alaska.

On April 15, 1975, appellee Katie Mann submitted to…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bryan v. Itasca CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Aguchak v. Montgomery Ward Co., Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Breese Ex Rel. Breese v. SmithAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Wooley v. Shell Petroleum Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Gregory v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Atkinson v. HaldaneAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  2. John v. BakerAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Sheppard v. SheppardIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Ahboah v. Housing Authority of the Kiowa Tribe of IndiansSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  5. In re Estate of William J. HannifinUtah Supreme Court · 2013

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API