Legal Opinion
Burrell v. Cummins Great Plains, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Iowa
Decided July 7, 2004No. 4:03-cv-40355PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
GRITZNER, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Clerk’s No. 10) and Motion to Strike (Clerk’s No. 25) in this employment discrimination action brought by Plaintiff David Burrell (“Bur-rell”) against Defendant Cummins Great Plains, Inc. (“Cummins”). Plaintiff is represented by Thomas Werner; Defendant is represented by Lora McCollom. The parties have not requested a hearing nor does the Court deem one necessary. The matter is fully submitted and ready for disposition.
I. MOTION TO STRIKE
As a preliminary matter, the Court…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rodriguez v. Conagra Grocery ProdCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- Husinga v. Federal-Mogul Ignition Co.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2007
- Rodriguez v. Conagra Grocery Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- Thompson v. UGL UNICCO SERVICE CO.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2010