Legal Opinion

In re Young

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 3, 2007No. 26241Published

1Per curiam

The Full Panel (Panel) adopted the report of the Hearing-Master finding Respondent’s misconduct in litigation was more “unprofessional” than “unethical,” and recommending that the Court discipline Respondent by issuing an admonition. The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) appeals, contending the Panel erred in failing to find Respondent violated the Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 407, SCACR (RPC), to recommend a more severe sanction, and to require Respondent to pay $1,552.00 as the costs of the proceeding. We agree with ODC that Respondent violated the RPC, that a public reprimand is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re FlomSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  2. In Re YoungSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  3. In Re RuffinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API