Legal Opinion

In Re Flom

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 27, 2003No. 25742PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

In this attorney disciplinary matter, the Commission on Lawyer Conduct concluded respondent committed misconduct and recommended disbarment. We agree and disbar respondent.

Initial Formal Charges 1

Matter I

After transmission repairs were performed by a mechanic on their Ford truck, Mr. and Mrs. Doe continued to have transmission difficulties and retained respondent. On June 28, 1994, respondent sent a letter to the mechanic explaining the situation and demanding relief. He then submitted a bill for this letter to UAW-Ford Legal Services. By letter dated July 15, 1994, the mechanic replied to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of YarboroughSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  2. Matter of MooreSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re RuffinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. FlomOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  3. In re YoungSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API