Legal Opinion

In Re Ruffin

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 21, 2005No. 25956PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

In this attorney disciplinary matter, the Commission on Lawyer Conduct filed formal charges against respondent, Thomas E. Ruffin, Jr. After a hearing, the Panel recommended an indefinite suspension.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

The charges against respondent stem from his involvement in a real estate deal with two doctors. The Doctors and respondent formed a limited liability company (LLC) for the purpose of purchasing a lot and constructing a building in which respondent could rent law office space. The agreement was for the Doctors to provide the purchase money and then become “silent partners” with…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re ThompsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. In Re LarkinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  3. In the Matter of GibbesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  4. In the Matter of SipesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  5. In Re FlomSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re RuffinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  2. In re YoungSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API