Legal Opinion

In Re Young

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 24, 2005No. 26055PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) and respondent have entered into an Agreement for Discipline by Consent pursuant to Rule 21, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, in which respondent admits misconduct and agrees to either an admonition or a public reprimand. We accept the agreement and issue a public reprimand. The facts, as set forth in the agreement, are as follows.

FACTS

On or about July 29, 2003, at the behest of his client, respondent sent a letter offering to settle litigation between his client and another individual. The settlement proposal threatened criminal prosecution to gain an advantage…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Reciprocal Discipline of HaderlieNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  2. In Re Reciprocal Discipline of HaderlieNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  3. In re YoungSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API