Legal Opinion

Martin v. Philadelphia Suburban Transportation Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 9, 1969No. Appeal, No. 137PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice O’Brien,

Appellee, Edward J. Martin, brought suit against the Philadelphia Suburban Transportation Company (Suburban) for damages arising out of injuries suffered when two of Suburban’s trolleys collided on April 20, 1966. The jury returned a verdict for Martin in the amount of $12,141.50, which it broke down, although not requested to do so, into $141.50 for specials, $2,000.00 for pain and suffering, and $10,000.00 for impaired earning capacity. Post-trial motions were denied by the court below and judgment entered on the verdict.

Suburban on this appeal raises four…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bochar v. J. B. Martin Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  2. Clark v. Essex Wire Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Wilhelm v. UttenweilerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  4. Bourd v. BermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  5. Palmer v. Warren Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Lambert v. PBI INDUSTRIESSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Maya v. Johnson & JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Siegal v. StefanyszynSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Clark v. HoernerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Flick v. James Monfredo, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API