Legal Opinion

Smith v. Hall

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 6, 1936No. 251PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANTON, Circuit Judge.

This suit is for infringement of claim 11 of patent No. 1,262,860, issued April 16, 1918, on an application filed October 26, 1916, for a method for the incubation of eggs. This claim was held valid and infringed in Smith v. Snow, 294 U.S. 1, 55 S.Ct. 279, 79 L.Ed. 721, and Waxham v. Smith, 294 U.S. 20, 55 S.Ct. 277, 79 L.Ed. 733. It embraces a method of hatching which makes it possible to increase the capacity of an incubator to many thousands by the combination of two major steps. Instead of setting the entire capacity of an egg chamber at one time, the inventor…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Deering v. Winona Harvester WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Smith v. SnowSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Interurban Ry. & Terminal Co. v. Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911
  5. Waxham v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United Chromium v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
  2. Curtiss-Wright Corporation v. Link Aviation, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 1959
  3. F. A. Smith Mfg. Co. v. Samson-United Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  4. Smith v. James Mfg. Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1937
  5. Smith v. James Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API