Legal Opinion

Calles v. Scripto-Tokai Corp.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 2007No. 101089PublishedCited by 117 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

Justices Freeman, Fitzgerald, and Garman concurred in the judgment and opinion.

Justice Karmeier specially concurred, with opinion.

Chief Justice Thomas and Justice Kilbride took no part in the decision.

OPINION

In Illinois, two tests are employed when determining whether a product is unreasonably dangerous under a strict liability design-defect theory — the consumer-expectation test and the risk-utility test. In this case, we are asked to consider whether there is a “simple product” exception to the application of the risk-utility test. That is, we must decide whether a product which is deemed…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Suvada v. White Motor Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Ward v. K Mart Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Barker v. Lull Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Soule v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Coney v. J. L. G. Industries, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1983

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by117 opinions

  1. Tincher, T. v. Omega Flex, Inc., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Brandon Stollings v. Ryobi Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  3. Winters v. Fru-Con Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  4. Mikolajczyk v. Ford Motor Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Seymour v. CollinsIllinois Supreme Court · 2015

112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API