Legal Opinion

In re. Morris Vernell Hires, Jr.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided June 15, 2016No. 16-12744-JPublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BY THE PANEL:

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2255(h) and 2244(b)(3)(A), Morris Vernell Hires has filed an application seeking an order authorizing the district court to consider a second or successive motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his federal sentence, 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Such authorization may be granted only if this Court certifies that the second or successive motion contains a claim involving:(1) newly discovered evidence that, if proven and viewed in,.light of the evidence as a whole, would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that no reasonable factfinder would…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  2. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Welch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Irma Ovalles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
  2. United States v. Derwin FrittsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
  3. United States v. Ronald PeppersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
  4. United States v. Isaac SeabrooksCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
  5. In re ChanceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API