Legal Opinion

Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance v. Marlette Homes, Inc.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 22, 1996No. Docket 181921PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarilyn Kelly, P.J.

In this subrogation action, plaintiff, Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance Company, appeals as of right from a grant of summary disposition for defendants Marlette Homes, Inc. and Coachman Industries, Inc. pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(7). Plaintiff argues that defendants are not entitled to claim the statute of repose as an affirmative defense where Marlette was not a contractor as defined by MCL 600.5839; MSA 27A.5839. We reverse.

i

In 1971, Terry and Darlene Weir contracted to purchase a modular home manufactured by defendant Marlette. Defendant delivered the modular home to the Weirs’ property and set…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. O'BRIEN v. Hazelet & ErdalMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Popma v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'n.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Gross v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Witherspoon v. GuilfordMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Oole v. OostingMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance v. Marlette Homes, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Bombalski v. Auto Club InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Spencer v. Citizens InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Ross v. State of MichiganMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. State Defender Union Employees v. Legal Aid & Defender Ass'n of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API