Legal Opinion

Ross v. State of Michigan

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 2, 2003No. Docket 233583PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff Guy A. Ross appeals as of right the trial court’s February 15, 2001, judgment denying his motion for summary disposition and granting defendants summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(1). The trial court determined that the statutory period of limitation had expired on plaintiff’s action and quieted title to the subject property in defendant Hasan Ali Altai! We reverse.

This case involves a dispute over property located within the city of Detroit. The first parcel of property is commonly known as 8529 W. Eight Mile (Item 9410) and is described as the east twenty feet of Lot 1. The…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Roberts v. Mecosta County General HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Hazle v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance v. Marlette Homes, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Wickens v. Oakwood Healthcare SystemMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Dow v. State of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 1976

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Monroe County Department of Human Services v. Kelli B.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Morris & Doherty, PC v. LockwoodMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Niles Township v. Berrien County Board of CommissionersMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Wayne County Treasurer v. Westhaven Manor Ltd. Dividend Housing Ass'nMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Niles Twp. v. Berrien Cty. Bd. of Comm'rsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API