Legal Opinion
Norton v. Sperling Law Office, P.C.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided February 24, 2006No. Civil JFM-05-1478PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
MOTZ, District Judge.
Plaintiff Michelle Norton (“Norton”) has brought this action against defendant The Sperling Law Office, P.C. (“Sperling”) for legal malpractice. Now pending before me is Sperling’s motion for summary judgment on limitations grounds. For the reasons that follow, the motion will be denied.
I
Norton lives in Littlestown, Pennsylvania, but works in Maryland at a Home Depot retail outlet. (Compl. ¶ 9; Police Report at 2, Exhibit 2A to Sperling Br.) On July 16, 2002, while commuting home from work and after having just crossed the border into Pennsylvania, Norton’s…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Flaherty v. WeinbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Doughty v. PrettymanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
- Steketee v. Lintz, Williams & RothbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- ALS Scan, Inc. v. Digital Service Consultants, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Michael C. Ryan and Ryan Data Exchange, LTD. d/b/a Rydex, LTD. v. Simmons Perrine Moyer Bergman, PLCCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2018