Legal Opinion
South Dakota Subsequent Injury Fund v. Heritage Mutual Insurance Co.
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided March 6, 2002No. 21841PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOVRIEN, Circuit Justice.
[¶ 1.] South Dakota Subsequent Injury Fund (SIF) appeals the circuit court’s judgment affirming Department of Labor’s (Department) determination that Heritage Mutual Insurance Company (Heritage), was entitled to full compensation from SIF for the subsequent injuries of William Belt and Edward McGee, based on the conclusion that the 1984 version of SDCL 62-4- 34 governs the rights and duties of the parties based upon the date of injury. We affirm.
SUBSEQUENT INJURY FUND
[¶ 2.] A brief review of the history of SIF would be helpful before we turn to the facts of each…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Sander v. Geib, Elston, Frost Professional Ass'nSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- South Dakota Subsequent Injury Fund v. Casualty Reciprocal ExchangeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Lyons v. Lederle LaboratoriesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Jasper v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Faircloth v. Raven Industries, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rodriguez v. PatakiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Dakota Truck Underwriters v. South Dakota Subsequent Injury FundSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Homestake Mining Co. v. South Dakota Subsequent Injury FundSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Sopko v. C & R TRANSFER COMPANY, INC.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Dakota Truck Underwriters v. South Dakota Subsequent Injury FundSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.