Legal Opinion
Department of Water & Power v. Vroman
California Supreme Court
Decided May 26, 1933No. Docket No. S.F. 14899PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
This is an application for a writ of mandate to compel the respondent as secretary of the board of water and power commissioners of the city of Los Angeles to sign a proposed contract between the Department of Water and Power of said City and the Reconstruction Finance Corporation. The matter is submitted on a general demurrer to the petition.
From the petition the following facts appear :
The Department of Water and Power is an established charter department of the city of Los Angeles (Stats. 1925, p. 1094), and has charge, superintendence and control of works for providing and supplying said…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Garrett v. SwantonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Controversy Between California Toll Bridge Authority & City & County of San Francisco v. WentworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- California Toll Bridge Authority v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Shelton v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Thompson v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- The Housing Authority v. DockweilerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Robertson v. ZimmermannNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Oppenheim v. City of FlorenceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- State Ex Rel. Public Institutional Building Authority v. GriffithOhio Supreme Court · 1939
- Schmidt v. Village of KimberlyIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.