Legal Opinion

Morton v. Griggs, Cooper & Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 9, 1925No. 24,313PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, C.

Plaintiff is engaged in the business of furnishing outdoor advertising. Defendant is the manufacturer of the “Home Brand Pure Food Products.” In July, 1919, they entered into a contract by which plaintiff agreed to erect, in the spring of 1920, on sites to be provided by himself, 50 or more field bulletin boards adjacent to highways near towns in the northwest to be designated by defendant, no less than 4 bulletins to be located in the vicinity of each town, and agreed to paint these boards in an artistic manner from a design approved by defendant, and to repaint them about every 12…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Scheerschmidt v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  2. Tingue v. PatchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
  3. Kommerstad v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  4. Snyder v. Minnetonka & White Bear Navigation Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  5. Mo v. BettnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. May Department Stores Co. v. BellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  2. Lundblad v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  3. Marshall v. LovellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1926
  4. Zywiec v. City of South St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API