Legal Opinion
State v. Padley
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided May 22, 2014No. 2013AP852-CRPublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLANCHARD, EJ.
¶ 1. Megan Padley was the driver of a vehicle involved in a fatal crash. There is no dispute that a sheriffs deputy who investigated the crash, and who subsequently directed a draw of Padley's blood, lacked probable cause to believe that Padley had alcohol or a controlled substance in her system. Nonetheless, relying on an amendment to the implied consent law effective as of 2010, Wis. Stat. § 343.305(3)(ar)2. (2011-12),1 the deputy used an "Informing the Accused" form to require Padley to choose between consenting to a draw of her blood for purposes of a chemical test or being…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Myers, D.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2015
- People v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- State of Iowa v. Dale Dean Pettijohn Jr.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2017
- State v. BairdWashington Supreme Court · 2016
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.