Legal Opinion

Raiford v. May Department Stores Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided August 19, 1999No. 14-98-00235-CVPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

MAURICE E. AMIDEI, Justice.

Appellants’ motion for rehearing is granted. We withdraw our prior opinion dated December 17, 1998, and substitute the following in its place.

Appellants appeal from a take nothing judgment based on the jury’s findings of no liability on the part of appellees and no damages. In their first nine points of error, appellants contend the trial court erred in instructing the jury in its first ten questions as to appellees’ right to search appellants after detaining them pursuant to section 124.001, Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Castleberry v. BranscumTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Elbaor v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Acord v. General Motors Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Plainsman Trading Co. v. CrewsTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Lemos v. MontezTexas Supreme Court · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Drichas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2004
  2. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Cockrell, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2001
  3. Pinnacle Gas Treating, Inc. v. Read, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2002
  4. David Drichas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2004
  5. Kristofer Thomas Kastner v. the Kroger Co., Ann Potter and Melinda Coombs, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API