Legal Opinion

Rosenblatt v. Levin

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided April 15, 1940PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Soot, V. C.

Complainant seeks to enjoin defendants from “using and permitting the aforesaid dwelling house to be used in any other manner than a private dwelling house” and “from causing or permitting loud noises to emanate” therefrom.

The basis of complainant’s asserted right to an injunction is a restrictive covenant imposed upon the land by the original developers of the restricted tract, of which covenant defendants were admittedly aware at the time they became lessees of the premises and of which they were fully advised, not only during the period they occupied the premises as lessees, but…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Scull v. EilenbergSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1923
  2. Robbins v. Bangor Railway & Electric Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1905
  3. Fortesque v. CarrollSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1910
  4. La Fetra v. BeveridgeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
  5. Clarke v. KurtzNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Southampton Civic Club v. CouchTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Bright v. Forest Hill Park Development Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
  3. Southampton Civic Club v. CouchTexas Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Keseling v. Mayor and City Council of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
  5. Majeski v. Stuyvesant Homes, Inc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API