Legal Opinion

Pugh v. See's Candies, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 10, 1988No. A021348PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BARRY-DEAL, J.

Following retrial of his action for wrongful discharge, appellant, an at-will employee, again appeals from the judgment entered after the jury returned a general defense verdict for See’s and the union 1 and after the court denied appellant’s motion for a new trial. In the first appeal, a judgment for defendants was reversed by this court in a published opinion, Pugh v. See’s Candies, Inc. (1981) 116 Cal.App.3d 311 [171 Cal.Rptr. 917] (hereafter Pugh I), holding that the trial court erroneously granted defendants’ motion for nonsuit. 2

Appellant now contends that the court…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Toussaint v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Crisci v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Bertero v. National General Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Buss v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. General Dynamics Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Binder v. Aetna Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. Cotran v. Rollins Hudig Hall International, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1998

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API