Legal Opinion

Weisenburger v. R.S.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 2006No. 20060318PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROTHERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] R.S. appealed from an order requiring him to be hospitalized at the North Dakota State Hospital for 90 days and an order allowing him to be treated involun*195tarily with medication during that 90-day period. We conclude the district court’s finding that R.S. is a person requiring treatment is not clearly erroneous and affirm.

I

[¶ 2] R.S., a 48-year-old male, was admitted to the State Hospital in early October 2006 after a law enforcement officer witnessed him behaving erratically. After his evaluation at the State Hospital, R.S. was diagnosed with psychotic disorder. A…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Castillo v. D.Z.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Williams v. D.P.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Pryatel v. M.M.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Arevalo v. M.S.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  5. In Interest of MmNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Interest of C.L.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Weisenburger v. R.S.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API