Weisenburger v. R.S.
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CROTHERS, Justice.
[¶ 1] R.S. appealed from an order requiring him to be hospitalized at the North Dakota State Hospital for 90 days and an order allowing him to be treated involun*195tarily with medication during that 90-day period. We conclude the district court’s finding that R.S. is a person requiring treatment is not clearly erroneous and affirm.
I
[¶ 2] R.S., a 48-year-old male, was admitted to the State Hospital in early October 2006 after a law enforcement officer witnessed him behaving erratically. After his evaluation at the State Hospital, R.S. was diagnosed with psychotic disorder. A…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Castillo v. D.Z.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Williams v. D.P.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Pryatel v. M.M.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Arevalo v. M.S.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- In Interest of MmNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Interest of C.L.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Weisenburger v. R.S.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006