Legal Opinion

Pryatel v. M.M.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 2005No. 20050399PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] M.M. appealed a district court order requiring him to be hospitalized at the North Dakota State Hospital for a period not to exceed 45 days and an order authorizing the state hospital to treat him involuntarily with medication. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] M.M., a 55-year-old male, has been diagnosed with a “psychotic disorder not otherwise specified.” M.M. was admitted to Trinity Hospital in Minot, North Dakota after he was unable to urinate. Doctors at Trinity determined kidney stones were the cause of M.M.’s inability to urinate. M.M. refused surgery to have the kidney…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Interest of JSNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Castillo v. D.Z.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Pryatel v. P.B.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2005

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Eckroth v. B.L.S.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. MeadorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  3. In Interest of MmNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Van Valkenburg v. J.S.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Miller v. B.D.K.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2007

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API