Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Hoadley v. Board of Insurance Commissioners

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 15, 1896PublishedCited by 12 opinions

This is a case of original jurisdiction. - The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the-court.

1Opinion of the Court

Mabry, C. J.:

This is an original proceeding by mandamus instituted on the relation of Russell H. Hoadley and sev■eral other persons named, to compel the Board of Insurance Commissioners of this State to re-issue to relators, doing business under the associate name of the “South & North American Lloyds,” of the city of New York, a certificate of authority to transact in■surance business in this State until the first day of -October, 1896.

The alternative writ alleges that the relators are citizens and residents of the State of New York, and had associated themselves together under the name of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Paul v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Hooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Ward v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  4. Commonwealth v. VroomanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Estate of JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. American Fire Insurance v. King Lumber & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1917
  3. Ex parte TaylorSupreme Court of Florida · 1914
  4. Ulmer v. First National BankSupreme Court of Florida · 1911
  5. State Ex Rel. Intermountain Lloyds v. PorterMontana Supreme Court · 1930

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API