Legal Opinion
Ulmer v. First National Bank
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided January 15, 1911PublishedCited by 11 opinions
This case was decided by Division A. Writ of error to the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County. t The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Whitfield, C. J
The following declaration was filed in the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County:
“The First National Bank of St. Petersburg, a corporation, by E. R. Gunby and William Hunter, its attorneys, sues M. W. Ulmer, for that heretofore, to-wit: on the 4th day of March, 1910, the defendant by his promissory note of said date, promised on or before the 4th day of September, 1910, for value received, to pay O. W. Shugars and W. T. Ogden or order, twelve hundred and fifty dollars, with interest from date at six per cent, per annum, payable at the office of the Bank of Largo, and all costs…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Orient Insurance v. DaggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Pembina Consolidated Silver Mining & Milling Co. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Southwestern Slate Co. v. StephensWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
- State ex rel. Hoadley v. Board of Insurance CommissionersSupreme Court of Florida · 1896
3Cited by11 opinions
- Dutton Phosphate Co. v. PriestSupreme Court of Florida · 1914
- American Fire Insurance v. King Lumber & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1917
- Hirschfeld v. McCullaghOregon Supreme Court · 1912
- Confederation of Canada L. Ins. Co. v. Vega Y ArminanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
- Commercial National Bank v. JordanSupreme Court of Florida · 1916
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.