Watson v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.
Appellant was convicted of forgery, his punishment being assessed at two years confinement in the penitentiary.
Appellant assigns what he denominates “fundamental erroE’ based on the proposition that the indictment shows on its face the forged instrument is payable to the Farmers & Merchants State Bank of Teague, Texas, but it fails t.o allege that the note was delivered to that bank. This proposition is without merit. The name of-R. L. King is the name forged to the note, which was payable to the Farmers & Merchants State Bank of Teague, Texas. The delivery of this…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Webb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
- Wragg v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Lucas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
- Mays v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
- Usher v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1904
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lopez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Squyres v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Mireles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918
- State v. ConleySupreme Court of Vermont · 1935
- Herrin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.