Legal Opinion

Wragg v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 31, 1912No. 1485PublishedCited by 15 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

HARPER, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of rape, and his punishment assessed at five years confinement in the State penitentiary, from which judgment he prosecutes this appeal.

1. Appellant filed a motion for a continuance on account of the absence of a witness by whom he states he expects to prove that he, the said witness, had had sexual intercourse on several occasions with the prosecuting witness with her consent. This would be no defense, for if it would be true that the witness would so testify, it would not authorize appellant to commit the offense of rape on her, if he did…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hardy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1892
  2. Harrell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
  3. Gonzales v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1894
  4. Gee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
  5. Patton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Lopez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  2. Windham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1956
  3. Holder v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
  4. Curry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  5. Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1947

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API