Legal Opinion

State v. Conley

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 2, 1935PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSlack, J.

The information contains four counts. The first charges, in substance, that at Enosburg, in the county of Franklin, on November 24, 1933, the respondent, with intent to defraud, did designedly, by the use of a false token, namely, an instrument in writing commonly called a check, drawn on the Island Pond National Bank, to the order of Boy Bailey, and purporting to be signed by B. G. Bailey, obtain money and other property from the St. Albans Grain Company, well knowing that said drawer was not then entitled to draw upon the drawee for the amount of said check, etc. The second count is of like…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. WardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1888
  2. People v. Ah SamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  3. State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1932
  4. Rudd v. RoundsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1892
  5. State v. ManningSupreme Court of Vermont · 1903

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. OvittSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
  2. State v. LadaboucheSupreme Court of Vermont · 1968
  3. Quesnel v. SmithSupreme Court of Vermont · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API