Rubin v. Platt Music Co.

STEPHENS, J., pro tem.

This case arose out of a contract to purchase a piano. The action was tried by the court without a jury and judgment went for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

The facts present little conflict. The plaintiff, respondent here, after seeing an advertisement of defendant announcing “Platt’s 19th Anniversary Sale,” went to the latter’s branch store and engaged in conversation one B. Goodman, manager of the branch, relative to the purchase of a piano. An agreement was arrived at, whereupon cash in the sum of $150 was paid over and an instrument on a blank piece of paper was…