Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Harris v. City of Fort Pierce

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided August 2, 1933PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a .mandamus proceeding brought by the relators alleging themselves to be the owners and holders of certain bonds, of the City of Fort Pierce. Petition, was' filed and the alternative writ of. mandamus was issued against the city and its various officials to compel the city to make provision for the payment of certain interest coupons which will mature on bonds held by the relators during the current fiscal year.

The writ alleges that .the relators' are. the owners and holders of certain bonds of the City of Fort Pierce and describes them by the date of issue, the character, of. the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. County Commissioners v. KingSupreme Court of Florida · 1869
  2. Town of Boynton Beach v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  3. State Ex Rel. Gillespie v. BaskinSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  4. State, Ex Rel. Harris v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  5. Jones v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Winter Haven v. State Ex Rel. BaynesSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
  2. State Ex Rel. Harrington v. City of Daytona BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
  3. State Ex Rel. Gillespie v. WalsmaSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
  4. State ex rel. Crane v. City of LakelandSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
  5. City of Kissimmee v. State Ex Rel. Ben Hur Life Ass'nSupreme Court of Florida · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API