Legal Opinion

City of Winter Haven v. State Ex Rel. Baynes

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided April 16, 1934PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, C. J.

— In this case the command of an alternative writ of mandamus required the City of Winter Haven, through the respondents its designated officials, to pay instanter certain matured bonds held by relator, which became due April 15, 1931. The writ also embraced a separate command to the effect -that in the event there was not sufficient sums of money on hand in the interest or sinking fund with which to pay relator’s bonds, that respondents be required to levy and collect a direct tax upon all the taxable property within the corporate limits of the city, sufficient to fully pay relator’s'…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Town of Boynton Beach v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  2. State Ex Rel. Buckwalter v. City of LakelandSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  3. State Ex Rel. Dupont-Ball, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  4. State Ex Rel. Gillespie v. County of BaySupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  5. McNally v. State Ex Rel. Bond Realization Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Block v. City of West Palm BeachCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
  2. Vallette v. City of Vero Beach, Fla.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
  3. City of Bradenton v. State Ex Rel. OliverSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
  4. State Ex Rel. Simmons v. HarrisSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
  5. City of Sarasota v. State Ex Rel. WhitfieldSupreme Court of Florida · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API