Legal Opinion

Kurer v. Parke, Davis & Co.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided March 30, 2004No. 03-0647PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchudson, J.

¶ 1. Donna Kurer and her children, Dylan and Dawson ("Kurer"), appeal from the circuit court order granting summary judgment and dismissing their action against Parke, Davis & Company and Warner-Lambert Company (collectively, "Warner-Lambert"). Kurer argues that the court erred in concluding that her summary judgment submissions failed to establish that Warner-Lambert was negligent per se for failing to warn that her oral contraceptive, Loestrin®, was a possible cause of Stevens-Johnson Syndrome ("SJS"), 1 and for failing to inform her that Loestrin® could cause headaches and other symptoms…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Green Spring Farms v. KerstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Gross v. HoffmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Grams v. BossWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Dippel v. ScianoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. In re Zimmer, Nexgen Knee Implant Prods. Liab. Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  2. McDarby v. Merck & Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
  3. Levine v. WyethSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
  4. Stange, T. v. Janssen PharmaceuticalsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. Forst v. SmithKline Beecham Corp.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2009

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API