Legal Opinion
McDarby v. Merck & Co., Inc.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided May 29, 2008No. A-0076-07T1, A-0077-07T1PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
949 A.2d 223 (2008)
401 N.J. Super. 10
John McDARBY and Irma McDarby, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Respondents,
v.
MERCK & CO., INC., Defendant-Appellant.
Thomas Cona and Joyce Cona, Plaintiffs-Respondents,
v.
Merck & Co., Inc., Defendant-Appellant.
No. A-0076-07T1, A-0077-07T1
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued January 16, 2008.
Decided May 29, 2008.
Douglas S. Eakeley argued the cause for appellant in both cases (Lowenstein Sandler, attorneys; Mr. Eakeley, Michael Dore and Alan S. Modlinger, Roseland, on the brief).
Ellen Relkin, New York, NY, argued the cause for respondents John…
2Cases cited71 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Mendez v. ShahDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2014
- In re Accutane Litig.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2018
- Cornett v. Johnson & Johnson & Cordis Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010
- Montich v. Miele USA, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2012
- Cornett v. Johnson & JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2012
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.