Legal Opinion
Greenwood v. Kier
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided March 31, 1952No. 16691, 16692PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Alter
Cecil Kier and Lois Kier, husband and wife, brought separate actions against Grace Greenwood and Royal Photo Service, Inc., to recover damages for personal injuries resulting to each of them in a collision of an automobile which Cecil Kier was driving with an automobile owned by defendant Royal Photo Service, Inc., which was being operated by one Charles Greenwood, husband of Grace Greenwood. The actions were consolidated for trial to a jury, resulting in verdicts in favor of Cecil Kier in the sum of $20,000 and in favor of Lois Kier in the sum of $25,-000, upon which verdicts judgments were…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Boyd v. CloseSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
- Hutchins v. HaffnerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1917
- Hexter v. BurgessCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- Cook v. MannTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
- Boltz v. BonnerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp. v. HeathSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- Moore v. SkilesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
- Nail Ex Rel. Nail v. Oklahoma Children's Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Avo B. Bethel and the Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, a Connecticut Corporation v. Herbert A. ThornbroughCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
- Foster v. FederSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.