Legal Opinion

Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp. v. Heath

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 7, 1986No. 83SA293PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YOLLACK, Justice.

The defendant-appellant, Ortho Pharmaceutical Corporation (Ortho), a manufacturer of oral contraceptives, appeals a judgment entered upon a verdict of $975,000 and prejudgment interest in the amount of $506,542.80 in a products liability action for personal injuries suffered by plaintiff-ap-pellee, Jo Ellen Murphy Hyland Heath (Heath). Heath attributed her acute kidney failure in November, 1974 to her use of Ortho-Novum, a brand of oral contraceptive made by Ortho. The trial court denied Ortho’s motion for judgment N.O.V. and Ortho’s motion for new trial. Ortho appeals. We…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Barker v. Lull Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Turner v. General Motors Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Dunham v. Vaughan & Bushnell Mfg. Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Hiigel v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
  5. Cepeda v. Cumberland Engineering Company, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1978

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Rahmig v. Mosley MacHinery Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Toner v. Lederle LaboratoriesIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Committee for Better Health Care for All Colorado Citizens v. MeyerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  4. Armentrout v. FMC Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  5. Kokins v. Teleflex, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API