Sorensen v. Coast-To-Coast Stores (Central Organization), Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LESLIE, Judge.
Plaintiff Sorensen filed suit against defendant Coast to Coast alleging causes of action for fraud and misrepresentation, for breach of contract, and for violations of franchise law. Defendant moved for summary judgment on the basis of a release signed by Sorensen. The trial court granted defendant’s motion and ordered judgment entered in defendant’s favor. Soren-sen appeals from the order for summary judgment.
We affirm the trial court’s order granting summary judgment.
FACTS
In early 1980 plaintiff Sorensen decided he wanted to purchase a business and began scouting the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Nord v. HerreidSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Couillard v. Charles T. Miller Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Maynard v. Durham & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. Tapemark Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Oskey Gasoline and Oil Company, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation v. Continental Oil Company, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Carlock v. Pillsbury Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1989
- Noble v. C.E.D.O., Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Goldberger v. Kaplan, Strangis & Kaplan, P.A.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Crystal Green v. City of CrystalCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- Minnesota Corn Processors, Inc. v. American Sweeteners, Inc. (In Re American Sweeteners, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.