Legal Opinion

State v. Runions

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1983No. 48972-6PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDimmick, J.

Where a defendant is convicted, and while his appeal is pending, he is compelled to testify against a codefendant under a grant of immunity pursuant to CrR 6.14, what effect, if any, does that grant of immunity have on his conviction and sentence? We hold that the grant of immunity has no effect whatsoever on the conviction and sentence, but would bar a retrial.

Defendant Runions confessed to the crime of burglary. In his confession he implicated another person, Don Lund-quist, as a coperpetrator. Both men were charged with second degree burglary but were tried separately. Runions was found…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. John J. Frank v. United States of America, Oliver W. Angelone v. United States of America, John W. Leon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
  4. State v. CarrollWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Steinberger v. DIST. CT. IN & FOR TENTH JUD.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. ToomeyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  2. State v. GonzalezAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. GonzalezCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1992
  4. State v. McCulloughCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
  5. In Re Dependency Of : A.m-s., Dob: 12/17/08, Sergio Michel-garcia, Pet v. State Of Wa, RespCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API