Legal Opinion

State v. Gonzalez

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided February 14, 1992No. A-4063PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRYNER, Chief Judge.

In this case, we review a superior court order deciding that Alaska’s witness immunity statute violates the Alaska Constitution’s privilege against self-incrimination. We affirm the superior court’s order.

PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Jill Jahnke-Leland, Carl Jahnke-Leland, Peter H. Leland, and Jeffrey DeGrasse were jointly charged with first-degree murder, attempted first-degree murder, and related offenses stemming from a shooting incident near Ketchikan. The superior court ordered separate trials for the defendants. Jill Jahnke-Leland was tried first. The jury acquitted…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Native Village of Elim v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. GonzalezAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Munson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Brandon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1992
  5. Hazelwood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API