Legal Opinion

Steinberger v. DIST. CT. IN & FOR TENTH JUD.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 11, 1979No. 28380PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Carrigan

This is an original proceeding in the nature of prohibition and mandamus brought pursuant to C.A.R. 21. Petitioner asks this court: (1) to set aside the respondent district court’s order denying the petitioner’s motion to dismiss official misconduct charges against her, (2) to compel the respondent court to vacate the guilty verdict and sentence, and (3) to dismiss all charges against the petitioner. We issued a rule to show cause and now make the rule absolute.

The petitioner and her supervisor, Adolph Beruman, were charged together with second degree official misconduct in violation of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Berman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. New Jersey v. PortashSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Reina v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Korematsu v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. People v. GuentherSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  2. People v. RomeroSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  3. People v. ManningSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  4. People v. ClarkColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. People v. YoungColorado Court of Appeals · 1999

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API