Legal Opinion

Hagan v. Quinn

District Court, C.D. Illinois

Decided March 23, 2015No. 13-3357PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SUE E. MYERSCOUGH, U.S. District Judge:

This cause is before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint filed by Defendants Patrick J. Quinn, Jerome Stermer, and Yelisha Haddox. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED as to Plaintiffs’ federal claim. As a matter of law, Plaintiffs’ lawsuit to protect their jobs was not constitutionally protected speech. In any event, Defendants are entitled to qualified immunity from damages. Further, the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiffs’ state law claim.

I. BACKGROUND

A. Plaintiffs’ Underlying Lawsuit

Plai…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hagan v. QuinnCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
  2. Hoffman v. DeWitt CountyDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2016
  3. James Hunt v. City of Chicago, David Brown, and Larry SnellingDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2026
  4. Kathleen Hagan v. Patrick QuinnCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
  5. McBride v. McLean CountyDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API