Legal Opinion

Hagan v. Quinn

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided August 14, 2017No. 15-1791PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

■ HAMILTON, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs are former arbitrators for the Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission. In 2011, plaintiffs and another arbitrator brought a due process action challenging the implementation of House Bill 1698, a workers’ compensation reform statute that had terminated their six-year appointments under prior law. The district court granted summary judgment for defendants, and we affirmed, concluding that plaintiffs failed to demonstrate a clearly established right that was violated by legislation ending their six-year terms as arbitrators. Dibble v. Quinn, 793 F.3d 803,…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Edward Tobey v. Brenda ChibucosCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  2. Dawn Hanson v. Chris LeVanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
  3. Shayna Lathus v. City of Huntington BeachCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
  4. Peter Daza v. State of IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  5. Martyn Baylay v. Etihad Airways P.J.S.C.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API