Legal Opinion

Rabb v. Seidel

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 21, 1920No. 6265PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoursund, J.

This was a suit by William Seidel on a promissory note executed by Jesse S. Fry, T. J. Lawson, D. McNeill Turner, S. M. Turner, and Frank Rabb, payable to B. H. Wilson and A. C. Priday, which resulted in a judgment in favor of plaintiff, except as against Mrs. Turner. The trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are as follows:

“Findings of Fact.
“First. On and prior to September 30, 1907, defendants T. J. Lawson, Jesse S. Fry, and D. McNeill Turner were interested in the development of the Piedras Pintas oil field in Duval county, Tex., and engaged in the production and marketing…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hooper v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Meeker v. ShanksIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. City of San Antonio v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  4. First National Bank v. StrangIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Morris v. MortonNebraska Supreme Court · 1883

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. FFP Marketing Co. v. Long Lane Master Trust IVCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2005
  2. Carter v. DeJarnattCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  3. Rabb v. SeidelTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  4. Casner v. San Diego Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. Devore v. Northernbanc Securities Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API