Legal Opinion
Rabb v. Seidel
Texas Commission of Appeals
Decided April 25, 1923No. 374-3480PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.
William Seidel brought this suit on a promissory note reading: “$10,000.00.
“Corpus Christi, Tex., Sept. 30, 1907..
“One year after date I, we or either of us for value received promise to pay to the order of B. H. Wilson and A. C. Priday the sum of ten thousand dollars, with interest thereon from date hereof, at the rate of ten per centum per annum from date until paid. Interest payable annually, as it accrues, and both principal and interest payable at Corpus Christi, Texas.
“And in case default is made in the payment of this note we promise and bind ourselves, severally, to pay ten per cent,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Janes v. BensonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
- Evans v. Speer Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1898
- Roberts v. McGrathWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
- First National Bank v. StrangIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
- Rabb v. SeidelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- FFP Marketing Co. v. Long Lane Master Trust IVCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2005
- National Cattle Loan Co. v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Casner v. San Diego Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Schmidt v. Citizens Industrial Bank of AustinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- FFP Marketing Company, Inc. v. Long Lane Master Trust IV and MTGLQ Investors, L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.