Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Strang

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1874PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Writ of Error to the Circuit Court of Clinton county;- the Hon. Silas L. Bryan, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Walker

The note sued on in this case ivas made and delivered by the payors to one Ervy, as their agent, to get it discounted at the bank. It was never negotiated to the bank, nor did it ever own the note. It was presented to the bank for discount, but it refused to receive it and loan the money. Ervy thereupon sold and delivered the note to one Smith, who afterwards sold and delivered it to Gillespie, for whose use this suit is brought. He instituted suit on the note in the name of the bank, for his own use, giving bond for costs. A trial was had before The judge and a jury, resulting in a verdict…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Chamberlain v. HoppsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1836

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Telford v. PattonIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Branch v. Commissioners of Sinking FundSupreme Court of Virginia · 1885
  3. First National Bank v. HenryIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Rabb v. SeidelTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  5. Salley v. TerrillSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1901

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API