Legal Opinion

Harris v. Harris

California Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1881No. 8,087PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff, and from an order denying a new trial in the Superior Court of Lassen County. Hendrick, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Sharpstein, J.:

The findings of the jury that the deed from J. H. Harris to E. A. Harris was not signed by the former, or by any one authorized by writing to sign it, and that said deed was not delivered to the defendant (E. A. Harris) by J. H. Harris, or by any one authorized by him to deliver it, arc attacked by *621the appellant on the alleged ground of insufficiency of the evidence to justify them.

There is no conflict in the evidence upon either of these points. Mr. McKissick, who was called by the plaintiff) testified on his direct examination that on “ the morning of May 17, 1880, Mr. E. A.…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Cox v. SchnerrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Hotaling v. HotalingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Kenney v. ParksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Rich v. ErvinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Tweedale v. BarnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API