Legal Opinion
Perfect Fit Industries, Inc. v. Acme Quilting Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 15, 1979No. 77 Civ. 2004 (CBM)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOTLEY, District Judge.
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
Plaintiff Perfect Fit Industries, Inc. (Perfect Fit), a Delaware corporation, has brought this suit against defendant Acme Quilting Co. (Acme), a New York Corporation, for false designation under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a), and for unfair competition under New York law. A trial was held by the court. The court finds that Perfect Fit has failed to prove its two causes of action by a clear preponderance of the evidence. Therefore, the court finds for the defendant and makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Kellogg Co. v. National Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Flexitized, Inc., and Flexitized Sales Corporation v. National Flexitized Corporation and Dubin-Haskell Lining Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- Clairol Incorporated v. The Gillette CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Norwich Pharmacal Company v. Sterling Drug, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- American Chicle Co. v. Topps Chewing Gum, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- W.W.W. Pharmaceutical Company, Inc. v. The Gillette CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Perfect Fit Industries, Inc. v. Acme Quilting Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- WWW Pharmaceutical Co., Inc. v. Gillette Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Merchant v. LymonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Ideal World Marketing, Inc. v. Duracell, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.