Legal Opinion
WWW Pharmaceutical Co., Inc. v. Gillette Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 14, 1992No. 89 Civ. 1942 (CBM)PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW AND FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
MOTLEY, District Judge.
Plaintiff commenced this action on March 21, 1989, claiming that defendant’s unauthorized use of the terms SPORT and STICK in the packaging and marketing of its Right Guard deodorant and anti-perspirant products has injured plaintiff’s federally registered trademark SPORTSTICK for lip balm. Plaintiff alleges four causes of action: Count 1, for infringement of a registered trademark under § 32 of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1114(1)(a); Count 2, for false designation of origin…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Polaroid Corporation v. Polarad Electronics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Doe Lang, Petitioner/defendant-Appellant v. Retirement Living Publishing Co., Inc., Respondent/plaintiff-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- McGregor-Doniger Inc. v. Drizzle Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Thompson Medical Company, Inc. v. Pfizer Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Centaur Communications, Limited v. A/s/m Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Fisons Horticulture, Inc., in No. 93-7224 v. Vigoro Industries, Inc., in No. 93-7287Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- W.W.W. Pharmaceutical Company, Inc. v. The Gillette CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Victor Decosta v. Viacom International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Sunenblick v. HarrellDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Major League Baseball Properties, Inc. v. Sed Non Olet Denarius, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.